<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best storytellers always seem to exaggerate.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://feuerdorn88.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/the-best-storytellers-always-seem-to-exaggerate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://feuerdorn88.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/the-best-storytellers-always-seem-to-exaggerate/</link>
	<description>My thoughts, and a place to discuss them.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:44:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: COMMENTS! &#171; A Finely Crafted Run-on Sentence</title>
		<link>http://feuerdorn88.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/the-best-storytellers-always-seem-to-exaggerate/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>COMMENTS! &#171; A Finely Crafted Run-on Sentence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feuerdorn88.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/the-best-storytellers-always-seem-to-exaggerate/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] SEVEN [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEVEN [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://feuerdorn88.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/the-best-storytellers-always-seem-to-exaggerate/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feuerdorn88.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/the-best-storytellers-always-seem-to-exaggerate/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>The entire point of literature is that it is hypothetical, so I do agree that characters needn&#039;t be &quot;realistic&quot; all the time; real people are boring!  I like books that have those kinds of larger than life people and places.  
All the time I hear people saying that characters need to be real for students to relate to them, but I guess that&#039;s never been important to me.  When characters are real and do silly things and make mistakes, I mentally wince when I&#039;m reading the book.

However, back to the topic: I liked &quot;To Kill A Mockingbird.&quot; I think it does have a place in the literary canon.  But that might not stop it from being an &quot;adult&quot; book.  I know quite a few high school students who did not particularly appreciate it. I do not think this is because the students do not find the characters &quot;real&quot; enough, I think it is because the story is not compelling for the average 15 year old, and English teachers insist on being too Englishy about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire point of literature is that it is hypothetical, so I do agree that characters needn&#8217;t be &#8220;realistic&#8221; all the time; real people are boring!  I like books that have those kinds of larger than life people and places.<br />
All the time I hear people saying that characters need to be real for students to relate to them, but I guess that&#8217;s never been important to me.  When characters are real and do silly things and make mistakes, I mentally wince when I&#8217;m reading the book.</p>
<p>However, back to the topic: I liked &#8220;To Kill A Mockingbird.&#8221; I think it does have a place in the literary canon.  But that might not stop it from being an &#8220;adult&#8221; book.  I know quite a few high school students who did not particularly appreciate it. I do not think this is because the students do not find the characters &#8220;real&#8221; enough, I think it is because the story is not compelling for the average 15 year old, and English teachers insist on being too Englishy about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
